[1] Ramón, N., Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (2010). A multiplier bound approach to assess relative efficiency in DEA without slacks. European journal of operational research, 203(1), 261–269.
[2] Cooper, W. W., Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (2007). Choosing weights from alternative optimal solutions of dual multiplier models in DEA. European journal of operational research, 180(1), 443–458.
[3] Mavi, R. K., Saen, R. F., & Goh, M. (2019). Joint analysis of eco-efficiency and eco-innovation with common weights in two-stage network DEA: A big data approach. Technological forecasting and social change, 144, 553–562.
[4] Omrani, H., Valipour, M., & Mamakani, S. J. (2019). Construct a composite indicator based on integrating common weight data envelopment analysis and principal component analysis models: An application for finding development degree of provinces in Iran. Socio-economic planning sciences, 68, 100618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2018.02.005
[5] Ghazi, A., & Lotfi, F. H. (2019). Assessment and budget allocation of Iranian natural gas distribution company-A CSW DEA based model. Socio-economic planning sciences, 66, 112–118.
[6] Afsharian, M., Ahn, H., & Harms, S. G. (2021). A review of DEA approaches applying a common set of weights: The perspective of centralized management. European journal of operational research, 294(1), 3–15.
[7] Izadikhah, M., Shamsi, M., Sheikhan, A., & Ghafouri, F. (2021). A new hybrid approach based on fitch ranking and data envelopment analysis to evaluate the credit performance of the bank’s legal clients. Journal of decisions & operations research, 6(4), 553-569. (In Persian). https://www.sid.ir/fileserver/jf/1527-262543-fa-1063951.pdf
[8] Shaban, R., Banimahd, B., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., & Nikoumaram, H. (2020). Evaluate the efficiency of audit firms using data envelopment analysis. Journal of decisions and operations research, 5(3), 402-413. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22105/dmor.2020.236384.1160
[9] Abbasi Shureshjani, R., & Shakouri, B. (2021). A comment on. Big data and computing visions, 1(3), 156–160.
[10] Mirzaei, S. H. (2019). Ranking aggregation of preferences with common set of weights using goal programming method. Journal of applied research on industrial engineering, 6(4), 283–293.
[11] Monzeli, A., Daneshian, B., Tohidi, G., Razavian, S., & Sanei, M. (2021). A new model to measuring efficiency and returns to scale on data envelopment analysis. International journal of research in industrial engineering, 10(2), 128–137.
[12] Bodaghi, Z., Ahadzadeh Namin, M., & Shahverdiani, S. (2019). Analysis of common weighting method in data envelopment analysis based on customer satisfaction of companies active in Tehran Stock Exchange. Financial engineering and portfolio management, 10(38), 19–41. (In Persian). https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22519165.1398.10.38.2.8
[13] Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Huang, Z. M., & Sun, D. B. (1990). Polyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks. Journal of econometrics, 46(1–2), 73–91.
[14] Thompson, R. G., Singleton Jr, F. D., Thrall, R. M., & Smith, B. A. (1986). Comparative site evaluations for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas. Interfaces, 16(6), 35–49.
[15] Liu, S. T. (2014). Restricting weight flexibility in fuzzy two-stage DEA. Computers & industrial engineering, 74, 149–160.
[16] Wu, J., Chu, J., Sun, J., Zhu, Q., & Liang, L. (2016). Extended secondary goal models for weights selection in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation. Computers & industrial engineering, 93, 143–151.
[17] Podinovski, V. V, & Bouzdine-Chameeva, T. (2015). Consistent weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis. European journal of operational research, 244(1), 201–209.
[18] Podinovski, V. V. (2016). Optimal weights in DEA models with weight restrictions. European journal of operational research, 254(3), 916–924.
[19] Pourhabib, A., Kordrostami, S., Amirteimoori, A., & Matin, R. K. (2018). Performance measurement in data envelopment analysis without slacks: an application to electricity distribution companies. RAIRO-operations research, 52(4–5), 1069–1085.
[20] Pourhabibyekta, A., & Maghbouli, M. (2021). Perturbation and uniqueness of optimal weights in cross efficiency evaluation: An application to Iranian Gas companies. Modern research in decision making, 6(4), 263–283.
[21] Ahadzadeh Namin, M., Khamse, E., & Mohammadi, F. (2019). Performance evaluation of bank branches using weight control approach in data coverage analysis. Financial engineering and securities management, 10 (40), 1–28. (In Persian). https://www.sid.ir/fileserver/jf/6003813984001.pdf
[22] Kao, C., & Hung, H. (2005). Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the compromise solution approach. Journal of the operational research society, 56(10), 1196–1203.