Document Type : Original Article

Author

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Sciences, Semnan University, P.O. Box 35195-363, Semnan, Iran.

Abstract

Purpose: Providing an analytical approach to minimize risk to a situation that traders deal with model risk, as a financial risk arises by choosing an approximation model, for the underlying securities status in financial estimates.
Methodology: Improving the standard binomial pricing model and using the equivalence portfolio mechanism in a particular incomplete market situation which traders are uncertain about the actual status space of the stock binomial process.
Findings: From a research aspect, a model of approximation was provided and generalized with different hypotheses that minimizes the risk of the model for pricing call options. From an applied practical aspect, the results give to financial institutions the outlook to predict a mechanism to moderate excessive volatilities in the markets related to options.
Originality/Value: The study of the model risk is performed by maintaining the simple framework and elegance of the binomial model and then it is proved that by defining the optimality in the sense of minimum mean-square errors, the choice of an optimal approximation model is possible. In addition, the implementation and efficiency of the method for the multi-period model are explained.




 

Keywords

Main Subjects

Dierker, E., & Dierker, H. (2012). Ownership structure and control in incomplete market economies with transferable utility. Economic theory51(3), 713-728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-011-0621-y
Fontana, C., & Schweizer, M. (2012). Simplified mean-variance portfolio optimisation. Mathematics and financial economics6(2), 125-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-012-0067-4
Gundel, A. (2005). Robust utility maximization for complete and incomplete market models. Finance and stochastics9(2), 151-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-004-0148-1
Harman, R., & Štulajter, F. (2011). Optimality of equidistant sampling designs for the Brownian motion with a quadratic drift. Journal of statistical planning and inference141(8), 2750-2758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2011.02.025
Henderson, V. (2007). Valuing the option to invest in an incomplete market. Mathematics and financial economics1(2), 103-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-007-0005-z
Hull, J. (2006). Options, futures, & other derivatives. Solutions manual. Prentice Hall International.
Lazrieva, N., & Toronjadze, T. (2008). Optimal robust mean-variance hedging in incomplete financial markets. Journal of mathematical sciences153(3), 262-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-008-9128-x
Moenig, T. (2021). Variable annuities: market incompleteness and policyholder behavior. Insurance: mathematics and economics99, 63-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2021.03.007
Natolski, J., & Werner, R. (2014). Mathematical analysis of different approaches for replicating portfolios. European actuarial journal4(2), 411-435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-014-0094-z
Wielhouwer, J. L. (2003). On the steady state of the replicating portfolio: accounting for a growth rate. OR spectrum25(3), 329-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-003-0134-6
Wu, Z., Yang, Y., Bai, F., & Tian, J. (2012). Global optimality conditions and optimization methods for quadratic assignment problems. Applied mathematics and computation218(11), 6214-6231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2011.11.068
Zhang, Q., & Han, J. (2013). Option pricing in incomplete markets. Applied mathematics letters26(10), 975-978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2013.05.002
Zhou, Q. (2011). Two-agent Pareto optimal cooperative investment in incomplete market: an equivalent characterization. Journal of systems science and complexity24(4), 701-710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-010-9002-z